The
controversy arose after the Finnish National Bureau of Investigation (NBI)
blacklisted censorship critic Matti Nikki's site. Matti Nikki himself is
now under criminal investigation for aiding in the distribution of child
pornography, as he published a large portion of the filtering blacklist
on his still-censored website. MP Jyrki Kasvi has made an official
inquiry in the Finnish Parliament on the matter, and Effi has filed an
official complaint to the parliamentary ombudsman.
The Finnish Minister of Communication, Suvi Linden, and the NBI have
been severely criticized over the filtering system, which has been under
heavy scrutiny by the media. After stating that she will not tolerate
discussion criticizing the filtering system, as the situation is not a
matter of freedom of speech, a petition was signed by over 12,000 people
demanding her resignation. This was accompanied by a Thai civil rights
group questioning the blocking as child porn of a memorial site
dedicated to a member of the Thai royal family. Eventually the NBI
removed the memorial site from the blacklist, explaining that the DNS
based system blocks only whole sites, and that there was child
pornography site under the same domain; this raised questions about the
efficiency of the filtering system.
The NBI have published a statement explaining their actions, at the
request pf Linden. In it the NBI stated that there are filtered sites do
not contain any child pornography, but claimed that it was not their
fault, rather a side effect of the system. They also noted that they are
planning to address this issue by switching from a DNS based filter to a
URL based system.
The NBI's official position is that they block pornographic sites where
the actors look too young, and sites which link to these sites.
The general opinion after analysis by multiple people is that the list
of at least 1,700 sites contains a handful of actual child pornographic
sites. However, some sites in the list are located in countries like the
U.S., the Netherlands, Great Britain and Germany, and very few of those
contain even questionable or borderline material.
Dutch journalist Karin Spaink reviewed 40 sites on the list which were
physically located in the Netherlands. She concluded that some of the
sites have illegal child pornography, and that four of those are also
blocked in the Netherlands by their equivalent filtering system. She
estimated that about half of the 40 did not contain any illegal
material.
|