Melon Farmers Original Version

Censor Watch


2025: April

 2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025 
Jan   Feb   Mar   April   May   Latest  

 

Angel Guts: Red Classroom...

1979 Japan horror thriller by Chusei Sone, previously significantly cut, just passed 18 uncut by the BBFC


Link Here6th May 2025
Angel Guts: Red Classroom is a 1979 Japan horror thriller by Chûsei Sone
Starring Yûki Mizuhara, Keizô Kanie and Jun Aki IMDb

Distributors submitted this film to the BBFC in 2002 but the BBFC required unacceptable cuts and the distributors abandoned the UK release. The BBFC was finally passed 18 uncut for Blu-ray in 2025. Uncut and MPAA Unrated in the US.

Summary Notes

When a writer for a porn magazine, watches a "rape" porn that is set in a school, he becomes obsessed with the lead actress, Nami, and tries to find her. He meets her by chance as he arrives for a shoot at a hotel.

Versions

BBFC uncut
uncut
run: 78:35s
pal: 75:26s
18

MPAA Unrated

UK: Uncut and BBFC 18 rated for sexual violence, strong sex, nudity:
  • 2025 Third Window Films Blu-ray (rated 06/05/2025) titled Angel Guts - Red Classroom
US: Uncut and MPAA Unrated for:
banned
unreleased

BBFC cut

cut:
run: 77:18s
pal: 74:12s
18 1980

 

UK: BBFC 18 rated for sexual violence, strong sex, nudity for sexual violence, strong sex, nudity after BBFC cuts:
  • 2002 Artsmagic DVD (rated 16/09/2002)

The BBFC commented:

Compulsory cuts required to remove eroticising sight of forced exposure and groping of breasts and to remove eroticising detail from subsequent rape scene. Cuts made in accordance with BBFC Guidelines and BBFC Policy on sexual violence.

The video remained  unreleased after the BBFC required unacceptable cuts. Distributors ArtsMagic collected all five uncut versions of Nikkatsu's officially produced "Angel Guts" films from 1978-1988. Having had difficulties submitting Red Classroom and Red Dizziness to the BBFC back in 2002 they decided to abandon plans for the UK market full stop, because they knew they wouldn't be able to release the best versions that they could.

 

 

UK Children's Commissioner calls for ban of nudification AI apps...

Surely AI will work out how to evade such a ban


Link Here 28th April 2025

The Children's Commissioner, Rachel de Souza, is calling on the government to introduce a total ban on apps that use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to generate sexually explicit deepfake images of children and real adult people.

Dame Rachel de Souza's new report exposes how Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is being misused to create sexually explicit deepfake images of real people, and the alarming effect these nudification tools are already having on children's safety, wellbeing and participation online.

Despite being relatively new technology, GenAI -- which is often free to use and widely available -- has supercharged the growth of these tools. While it is illegal to create or share a sexually explicit image of a child, the technology enabling them remains legal -- and it is no longer confined to corners of the dark web but now accessible through large social media platforms and search engines.

Children's Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza said:

  • In our lifetime, we have seen the rise and power of Artificial Intelligence -- once the stuff of science fiction -- to shape the way we learn, connect and experience the world. It has enormous potential to enhance our lives, but in the wrong hands it also brings alarming risks to children's safety online.

  • Children have told me they are frightened by the very idea of this technology even being available, let alone used. They fear that anyone -- a stranger, a classmate, or even a friend -- could use a smartphone as a way of manipulating them by creating a naked image using these bespoke apps.

  • Girls have told me they now actively avoid posting images or engaging online to reduce the risk of being targeted by this technology -- we cannot allow sit back and allow these bespoke AI apps to have such a dangerous hold over children's lives.

  • The online world is revolutionary and quickly evolving, but there is no positive reason for these particular apps to exist. They have no place in our society. Tools using deepfake technology to create naked images of children should not be legal and I'm calling on the government to take decisive action to ban them, instead of allowing them to go unchecked with extreme real-world consequences.

Speaking to children about this emerging technology, the Commissioner's new report published today, 28th April, analyses the threat of nudification technology, assessing its use online and the impact on children. In focus groups, children told the Commissioner about their biggest concerns:

  • The high risk of harm to children: AI that generates naked or other sexually explicit deepfake images disproportionately targets girls and young women, and many tools appear only work on female bodies -- contributing to a culture of misogyny both online and offline.

  • Easy access to harmful tools: These AI tools are widely available via mainstream platforms, including the biggest search engines and app stores, with GenAI making the creation of harmful content easier and cheaper than ever.

  • Change in girls' online participation: Girls spoke about taking preventative steps to keep themselves safe from becoming victims of nudification tools by limiting their online participation -- in the same way that girls often take steps to protect themselves in real life, such as not walking home alone.

  • Demand for action from children: Young people want action taken to tackle the misuse of AI tools. Some children even questioned the purpose of these technologies which are so often used to harm: Even before any controversy206 I could already tell it was gonna be a technological wonder that's going to be abused. -- Girl, 16

The Children's Commissioner is calling for urgent action, including:

  • Banning bespoke nudification apps that enable users to generate sexually explicit images of real people;

  • Creating specific legal responsibilities for developers of GenAI tools to identify and address the risks their products pose and to mitigate the risks to children;

  • Establishing effective systems to remove sexually explicit deepfake images of children from the internet.

  • Recognising deepfake sexual abuse as a form of violence against women and girls and taking it seriously in law and policy. 

 

 

 

Grumpy censors...

Lebanon and Kuwait ban Snow White movie


Link Here23rd April 2025
Full story: Banned Films in Lebanon...Beirut Hotel
Snow White is a 2025 US children's romance by Marc Webb
Starring Rachel Zegler, Gal Gadot and Tituss Burgess BBFC link 2020 IMDb

The live-action remake of Disney's Snow White has been officially banned in both Lebanon and Kuwait, largely due to the casting of Israeli actress Gal Gadot in the role of the Evil Queen, local media sources have reported. Haberin Devami

Lebanon's Interior Minister signed the ban after a recommendation from the country's General Security's Film Control Committee. The committee cited Gadot's inclusion as the principal reason for rejecting the film, highlighting her past service in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and her public support for the Israeli military's actions in Gaza.

Kuwait's decision came shortly afterward, reportedly under pressure from civil society organizations and in line with the country's long-standing policy of opposing any form of cultural normalization with Israel.

 

 

Updated The internet starts to go dark for British users...

US free speech website blocks UK users so as avoid onerous and suffocating internet censorship by Ofcom


Link Here23rd April 2025
Full story: Online Safety Act...UK Government legislates to censor social media
The US right leaning forum website GAB has blocked internet users located in Britain. UK users can now only see a landing page explaining that UK internet censorship laws are unacceptable to the free speech loving forum. The website explains its actions as follows:

ATTENTION: UK Visitor Detected

The following notice applies specifically to users accessing from the United Kingdom.

Access Restricted by Provider

After receiving yet another demand from the UK's speech police, Ofcom, Gab has made the decision to block the entire United Kingdom from accessing our website.

This latest email from Ofcom ordered us to disclose information about our users and operations. We know where this leads: compelled censorship and British citizens thrown in jail for hate speech. We refuse to comply with this tyranny.

Gab is an American company with zero presence in the UK. Ofcom's demands have no legal force here. To enforce anything in the United States, they'd need to go through a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty request or letters rogatory. No U.S. court is going to enforce a foreign censorship regime. The First Amendment forbids it.

Ofcom will likely try to make an example of us anyway. That's because the UK's Online Safety Act isn't about protecting children. It's about suppressing dissent.

They're welcome to try. The idea that a British regulator can pressure a U.S. company that's IP-blocking the entire UK is as farcical as it is futile. If anything, it proves our point: censorship doesn't work. It only reveals the truth about the censors.

We proudly join platforms like Bitchute in boycotting the United Kingdom. American companies should follow suit. The power of the UK's parliament ends where the First Amendment begins.

The only way to vote against the tyranny of the UK's present regime is to walk away from it, refuse to comply, and take refuge under the impervious shelter of the First Amendment.

The UK's rulers want their people kept in the dark. Let them see how long the public tolerates it as their Internet vanishes, one website at a time.

 

Update: Ofcom responds

23rd April 2025. See article from ofcom.org.uk

The Online Safety Act introduces new rules for providers of online user-to-user, search and pornography services, to help keep people in the UK safe from content which is illegal in the UK, and to protect children from the most harmful content such as pornography, suicide and self-harm material.

Wherever in the world a service is based, if it has links to the UK, it now has duties to protect UK users. This includes having a significant number of UK users, or that the UK is a target market. These rules will also apply to services that are capable of being used by individuals in the UK and which pose a material risk of significant harm to them.

The Act only requires that services take action to protect users based in the UK -- it does not require them to take action in relation to users based anywhere else in the world.

Ofcom believes its flexible approach to risk assessment and mitigation allows all services to take appropriate and proportionate steps to protect UK users from illegal content. Some services might seek to prevent users in the UK from accessing their sites or parts of their sites, instead of complying with the Act's requirements to protect UK users. That is their choice.

If a service restricts UK users' access, that action would need to be effective in order for the service to fall out of scope of the Act. The key test remains whether the service has links to the UK. This will depend on the specific circumstances (including whether it is still targeting UK users, for example, by promoting ways of evading access restrictions). Ofcom would assess whether a service is in scope on a case-by-case basis and, where the Act applies, would consider the service's compliance with the law and, where necessary, use our investigation and enforcement powers.

We recognise the breadth and complexity of the online safety rules and that there is a diverse range of services in scope.

New regulation can create uncertainty and navigating the requirements can be challenging. Ofcom is committed to working with providers to help them comply with the Online Safety Act and protect their users. We have therefore developed a range of tools and resources to make it easier for them to understand -- and comply with -- their obligations. We also recently published a guide to help small services navigate the Online Safety Act.

 

 

Mikey...

1992 horror by Dennis Dimster reappears with an uncut 15 rating after previously being banned by the BBFC during the Jamie Bulger moral panic


Link Here6th April 2025
Mikey is a 1992 USA horror thriller by Dennis Dimster (as Dennis Dimster-Denk).
Starring Brian Bonsall and Josie Bissett and Ashley Laurence. BBFC link 2020 IMDb
The film was withdrawn from cinema release in 1993 when caught up in  the Jamie Bulger controversy.  It was then banned by the BBFC from 1996 VHS release. The film was rated BBFC 15 uncut when resubmitted for Blu-rayn in 2025. Uncut and MPAA R rated in the US.

Summary Notes

A strong thriller directed by Dennis Dimster-Denk. Brain Bonsall is extraordinary good as the young smart psycho.

The film received some controversy, because of Mikey's age in the film, when it's came out in the Spring of 1992.

Versions

BBFC uncut
uncut
run: 91:30s
pal: 87:50s
15

18 cert

Amazon
Amazon

MPAA R

Germany flag
Germany

Spanish flag
Spain

Ireland
Ireland

 

UK: Uncut and BBFC 15 rated for strong violence, injury detail, threat:
  • 2025 Treasured Films Blu-ray (rated 21/03/2025)

UK: Passed 18 uncut for:

  • 1992 cinema release

However the certificate was withdrawn in the fallout of the James Bulger killing. See article from en.wikipedia.org , (thanks to Jonathan)

The film was withdrawn from release in the United Kingdom following the James Bulger murder in Liverpool in 1993. It had been classified with an 18 certificate for cinema in November 1992, but head censor James Ferman demanded the certificate be returned.

The BBFC cinema certificate is no longer in the BBFC database.

 

UK: Available on Amazon Prime

Note that BBFC bans do not apply to online video. However BBFC bans do apply to TV broadcasts although TV companies can get the nod from the BBFC that if a film were to be submitted it would no longer be banned.

US: Uncut and MPAA R Rated for:

Germany: Uncut for:

Spain: The Spanish release is uncut for:

  • Es Smile Price R0 DVD

Ireland: Available on Irish video with the boast that it is banned in the UK

 

banned
banned
run: 91:29s
pal: 87:49s
rejectedUK: Banned by BBFC
  • 1996 Video Programme VHS (rated 20/12/1996)
UK: Banned by the BBFC in 1996 (in the fallout from the James Bulger killing) for:
  • 1996 VPD VHS

The BBFC explained their ban:

  • A 9 year old boy kills his foster family one by one, including the realistic drowning of his 3 year old sister. It was argued that this was a fantasy horror film and not to be taken literally, but three distinguished child psychiatrists advised us that the video was sufficiently realistic to have a dangerous impact on a significant proportion of vulnerable children.

UK: Passed 18 uncut  for:

  • 1992 cinema release

However the certificate was withdrawn in the fallout of the James Bulger killing. See article from en.wikipedia.org , (thanks to Jonathan)

The film was withdrawn from release in the United Kingdom following the James Bulger murder in Liverpool in 1993. It had been classified with an 18 certificate for cinema in November 1992, but head censor James Ferman demanded the certificate be returned.

The BBFC cinema certificate is no longer in the BBFC database.

 

 

Hopefully US free speech will trump UK's internet censorship law...

US officials challenge Ofcom over online safety laws' impact on free speech


Link Here 6th April 2025
Full story: Online Safety Act...UK Government legislates to censor social media
US state department officials have challenged Britain's internet censor over the impact on freedom of expression created by new online censorship laws, the Guardian understands.

A group of officials from the state department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) recently met Ofcom in London. It is understood that they raised the issue of the new online safety act and how it risked infringing free speech.

The state department body later said the meeting was part of its initiative to affirm the US commitment to defending freedom of expression, both in Europe and around the world. During the meeting, Ofcom officials claimed the new rules were only in place to deal with explicitly illegal content and material that could be harmful to children.

A state department spokesperson said: As Vice-President Vance has said, we are concerned about freedom of expression in the United Kingdom. It is important that the UK respect and protect freedom of expression.

Details of the meeting emerged after Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, denied that concerns over free speech had featured in tariff negotiations with the US.

In February, the US vice-president, JD Vance, complained of infringements on free speech in the UK. Elon Musk, one of Trump's closest allies, repeatedly claimed that some prison sentences handed down to people who incited the riots on X were a breach of free speech.

Free speech advocates say that the UK censorship law is going to bring about a culture of 'if in doubt, cut it out' as platforms seek to avoid being subject to Ofcom's enforcement powers.

 2008   2009   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014   2015   2016   2017   2018   2019   2020   2021   2022   2023   2024   2025 
Jan   Feb   Mar   April   May   Latest  

Censor Watch logo
censorwatch.co.uk

 

Top

Home

Links
 

Censorship News Latest

Daily BBFC Ratings

Site Information