Spanish judge bans the 2013 Ryanair bikini calendar
December 2013 |
See article from telegraph.co.uk
A Spanish judge has belatedly banned adverts for the 2013 Ryanair calendar featuring female flight attendants in bikinis.
The judge claimed that the calendar, released each year by the low-cost airline in support of charitable causes, was sexist.
Ryanair said it would appeal the decision.
Adverts for the calendar prompted an appeal by a gender extremist group, and this week a court in the southern city of Malaga ruled that the adverts treated the women as objects and were discriminatory,
Spanish media reported.
The judge reportedly banned the airline from using the pictures and ordered it to publish the judgement at its own expense.
The calendar raised over 100,000 euros for a Polish charity, the TVN Foundation, to help
sick children in Poland.
Spanish gender extremists take Ryanair to court over bikini calendar
April 2013 |
The Irish low budget airline Ryanair is being prosecuted by gender extremists in Spain over the production of their 2013 calendar featuring female cabin crew in bikinis.
Groups in Spain's Malaga province claim the calendar is 'offensive' and
exploits female employees. They claim that the public use of these images is illegal.
The case is set to be heard before a three-judge panel on April 30.
The calendar is sold on all Ryanair flights for $12 and all proceeds go to the Polish
TVN Foundation, which helps children suffering with cystic fibrosis. The company expects to raise $128,508 for the charity.
|15th February |
ASA whinges that a Ryanair bikini advert supposedly caused widespread offence
article from asa.org.uk
Two press ads for Ryanair Ltd.
a. The first ad, published in The Guardian, showed a woman in a bra and pants. She had one hand on her hip and pulled her pants slightly down with the thumb of the other. The headline stated RED
HOT FARES & CREW!!! ONE WAY FROM £ 9.99 . Further text stated BUY THE 2012 CABIN CREW CHARITY CALENDAR ON RYANAIR.COM! , and in the bottom right corner of the photograph, ORNELLA FEBRUARY .
b. The second ad, published in The Daily Telegraph and The Independent, showed a woman in a bra and pants. The headline stated RED HOT FARES & CREW!!! ONE WAY FROM £ 9.99 . Further text
stated BUY THE 2012 CABIN CREW CHARITY CALENDAR ON RYANAIR.COM! , and in the bottom right corner of the photograph, GILLIAN MARCH .
Thirteen complainants, who believed ad (a) was sexist and objectified women, particularly female cabin crew, challenged whether it was offensive and unsuitable for display in a national newspaper.
complainants, who believed ad (b) was sexist and objectified women, particularly female cabin crew, challenged whether it was offensive and unsuitable for display in a national newspaper.
Ryanair said the ads promoted their 2012 cabin crew charity calendar and used images taken directly from it. They said, because members of their cabin crew volunteered their time to produce and promote the calendar, it was not sexist
and could not be seen to objectify the women who appeared in it. They said, because similar images of women and men often featured in the same media, the ads could not be deemed offensive or unsuitable for public display.
Assessment: Complaints Upheld
The ASA noted both ads promoted one way fares from £ 9.99 and a cabin crew charity calendar. We also noted the women, featured in ads (a) and (b), were wearing
underwear and looking directly at the reader and considered that, although the images were not overtly sexual in content, the appearance, stance and gaze of the women, particular the one in ad (a), who was shown pulling her pants slightly down, were
likely to be seen as sexually suggestive. We also considered that most readers would interpret these images, in conjunction with the text RED HOT FARES & CREW!!! and the names of the women, as linking female cabin crew with sexually suggestive
behaviour. Although we acknowledged that the women in the ads had consented to appear in the calendar, we considered that the ads were likely to cause widespread offence, when displayed in a national newspaper, and therefore concluded that they breached
Ads (a) and (b) breached CAP Code rule 4.1 (Harm and offence). Action
|14th December |
Ryanair rightly not bothered by miserable complaints from Sweden about 2012 bikini calendar
13th December 2011. See article from
In about a month after the release of the 2012 edition of Ryanair's Cabin Crew Charity Calendar, the Swedish Advertising Ombudsman (Reklamombudsmannen-RO) has received 33 complaints about adverts promoting the calendar.
[Thirty Three] People
think the advertisment is sexist and that it doesn't belong on a website meant to sell plane tickets, Advertising Ombudsman Elisabeth Trotzig told The Local.
33 complaints lands the Ryanair calendar campaign second only to an ad campaign for
the Victoria Milan dating service, which supposedly encouraged marital infidelity, in terms of the number of complaints filed with the Ombudsman.
Ryanair now has two weeks to respond to the Ombudsman about the complaints, after which the watchdog
will decide how to proceed with the case.
Ryanair's spokesperson Stephen McNamara rightly didn't seem bothered by Swedish complaints over the calendar, a project the airline has carried out annually since 2008.
Ryanair's cabin crew
calendar has raised EUR500,000 ($672,000) for charity in just five years and we will continue to support the right of our crew to take their clothes off to raise money for those who need it most, he told The Local.
In line with previous years,
all 10,000 copies of the 2012 edition of the Ryanair swimsuit calendar have been sold.
Update: Now miserable Brits have a whinge at a Ryanair advert
14th December 2011. See
article from guardian.co.uk
The advertising watchdog is to launch an investigation into an ad campaign by Ryanair featuring a flight attendant in modest lingerie after whinges that it made it cabin crew look like glamour models .
The slightly pulled down bikini bottom
is sure to offend that advert censors of ASA. After all they do have a reputation to uphold as the Daily Mail of media censors.
The Irish budget airline ran a newspaper ad featuring a lingerie-clad flight attendant called Ornella, who appears as
the model for the month of February in the Ryanair charity calendar, with the strapline red hot fares & crew .
Ryanair has now been targeted by an online nutter campaign backed by more than 7,000 people.
The Advertising Standards
Authority has received 10 complaints from nutters who claim that the ads are sexist and objectify women, particularly female cabin crew . The complainants allege that they are offensive and unsuitable for display in a national newspaper .
|16th October |
Ryanair takes on Sweden's feminist censor
Thanks to Donald
article from thelocal.se
Budget airline Ryanair went on the attack, mocking Swedish feminist politician Birgitta Ohlsson's call for a boycott of the airline because of its allegedly sexist advertising practices.
This really is a storm in a D cup! said Ryanair
spokesman Stephen McNamara in a statement: We're sure that Boring Birgitta will be overrun by the flood of right minded, liberal, people who support Ryanair's determination to defend the rights of girls and boys to get their kit off – if they want to.
The airline's rebuttal comes hot on the heels of a call by Ohlsson for consumers to boycott the airline for refusing to apologize for an advertisement deemed sexist by Sweden's Trade Ethical Council against Sexism in Advertising (ERK).
It's my duty as a feminist politician to name and shame companies like this, the NotSoLiberal Party politician told The Local.
The airline said it would celebrate Ryanair's sexy Swedish ad by launching one million €10 mid week
seats. We will also be sending free tickets to Boring Birgitta so that she can take a nice relaxing break, loosen up a little and stop calling for silly boycotts, said McNamara.
|12th October |
Swedish advert censors get wound up by Ryanair advert
Thanks to Donald
Ryanair slammed from thelocal.se
Ryanair defends rights from thelocal.se
Low-cost airline Ryanair has received a reprimand from Sweden's Trade Ethical Council against Sexism in Advertising (ERK) for an ad campaign featuring a scantily clad woman posing as a schoolgirl.
The airline has been criticized for a campaign
aimed at marketing low price fares to coincide with the start of the school year. To drive home the point, a smiling schoolgirl in a mini-skirt and short blouse is depicted beside a blackboard announcing the hottest back to school prices.
According to ERK, the woman in the school uniform is used to catch the eye in a sexual manner that is offensive to women in general.
Ryanair claimed Sweden's Trade Ethical Council against Sexism in Advertising was out of touch with
the Britney Spears generation .
In defending the advertisement, Ryanair questioned whether the ERK accurately reflected the views of most Swedes: We are sure that the anti-funsters at the ERK do not speak for the majority of the famously
liberal and easy going Swedes .
The ad simply reflects the way a lot of young girls like to dress. We hope the old farts at the ERK loosen up a little.
Note that the British old farts at ASA also got wound up by a variation of
|1st February |
Letter to the Advertising Standards Authority
Thanks to Alan
Letter to the ASA:
Congratulations! You have done something which I never thought possible.
I am mightily unimpressed with Ryanair's appalling attitude towards its customers and its dodgy commercial practices in disguising its real fares
(and destinations). I have not yet travelled with that company, and it would be my last choice of airline for future flights. I now find myself for the first time actually sympathising with the company.
Your ruling in the case of their
"schoolgirl" advertisement strains credulity. I understand, from an article by Brendan O'Neill on the online journal Spiked, that the advertisement appeared in media with a combined readership of about 3.5 million and generated only thirteen
complaints. This really does seem to be a quite grotesque case of allowing yourselves to be swayed by a tiny number of absurdly prudish people.