A
court hearing of a case regarding censorship of pornographic
websites in Tunisia has been postponed to February 22nd,
confirmed Olivia Gre, director of the Tunisian chapter of
Reporters Without Borders (RSF).
Last year, a lawsuit was filed by three Tunisian lawyers, who
found free access to pornographic websites in Tunisia to be
dangerous to children and corrosive of Islamic values. The
court's decision sided with the lawyers, yet the Tunisian
Internet Agency (ATI) appealed the ruling on May 26th. On August
11th, 2011, the appeal was denied, but the ATI delayed
implementing the decision, pleading technical and financial
limitations.
They appealed the decision again, to Tunisia's Supreme Court,
prolonging the legal debate as to the acceptable extent of
internet freedom.
On February 3rd, RSF released a statement, entitled
Internet Filtering: Risks to Stepping Backwards, in
which it argued that blocking porn sites in Tunisia could mark a
prelude to the return of old censorship practices of the
previous regime. The statement recommended that internet
providers promote tools of parental control.
Update: Blocking Blocked
23rd February 2012. See
article from
tunisia-live.net
The Tunisian Internet will remain unblocked, for the time
being. The Supreme Court of Tunisia has cancelled the decision
of a lower court, which had previously ruled in favor of
blocking pornographic content on the internet.
The decision did not end the case, but sent it back to a
lower court, giving an apparent vote of no confidence in the
legal argumentation previously presented.
The decision was immediately hailed by free speech advocates
and by the Tunisian Internet Agency (ATI). The ATI's legal
argument against the suit, however, did not hinge upon issues of
civil liberties, but rather the technical ability of the agency
to implement the decision. According to a press release
distributed by the ATI this afternoon, all attempts of
application of judgment led to serious degradation of service.
Olivia Gre, director of the Tunisia office of Reporters
Without Borders (RSF) said: For us, it's definitely good
news. It means not taking a step backwards. According to Gre,
the trial would begin from scratch, with new legal arguments to
be employed in two to three months.